Talk:Fish stocks

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 November 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mwvolpe. Peer reviewers: Monica Tadros.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting article

Over here: [1]. Should something be mentioned on this page about the major decline of fish stocks worldwide? I did add a "see also" link to overfishing, but perhaps some information needs to be over here as well (the study found that 1/3 of fish stocks are currently collapsed, and forecasts that all fish stocks will collapse within 50 years). Esn 02:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link

I came to this article looking for the food. Can a mention of this be added at the top of this article? I was going to do this, but I don't know how to have two hatnotes on the same line. Just adding {{For|the food|stock (food)}} adds the note on an extra line, which looks untidy.

i.e. Should look like: "Not to be confused with stockfish. For the food, see stock (food)". --smiler (talk) 10:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Done. --Geronimo20 (talk) 11:00, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Definition seems limited

I was asked this morning to write a definition of "stock" for a biological opinion on a salmon hatchery. The definition the article leads with does not ring true for Pacific NW salmon, which exist as largely demographically independent populations. For these fish, as I and my colleagues have used the term, stock either refers to one of these populations, or several of them that are managed as a group (usually for harvest). Not complaining, just saying. Am reluctant to edit because don't fully understand the context of the current version. Are we talking groundfish harvest here?Busaccsb (talk) 22:50, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fish stock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.fisheries.is/the-fisheries/fishing-grounds/pelagic-and-straddling-stocks/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110612122237/http://www.ices.dk/datacentre/StdGraphDB.asp to http://www.ices.dk/datacentre/StdGraphDB.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:05, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fish stock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150603013953/http://www.oceansatlas.org/servlet/CDSServlet?status=ND0xOTk0MSZjdG5faW5mb192aWV3X3NpemU9Y3RuX2luZm9fdmlld19mdWxsJjY9ZW4mMzM9KiYzNz1rb3M~ to http://www.oceansatlas.org/servlet/CDSServlet?status=ND0xOTk0MSZjdG5faW5mb192aWV3X3NpemU9Y3RuX2luZm9fdmlld19mdWxsJjY9ZW4mMzM9KiYzNz1rb3M~

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scoring and suggested article improvements

This article has been chosen for monitoring and improvement by the Stockholm Environment Institute SDG 14 project (see here). We are monitoring improvements during the period August 2020 to July 2022 using a scoring tool devised of both automated and expert evaluation. The score for the entire article on Aug 8, 2020 (carried out 11 Feb 2021) was 50/100. For the lead it was 3.4/100. Advice to improve this article:

The title is technically incorrect - fish stock is the base for making fish soup. Fish stocks should be the correct title. (edit on 23 May 22: this has been changed in the meantime)
The lead should be lengthened and greatly improved to better reflect the content of the article.
The article could be improved by relating the importance of fish stock assessment to the targets of SDG 14. (edit on 23 May 22: SDG 14 is now mentioned but further detail could be provided)
The Aug 8 version has numbered notes and bulleted references. This needs to be reversed and all combined into numbered references. (edit on 23 May 22: this has been addressed in the meantime) ASRASR (talk) 17:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Housekeeping comment: see above for some edits made since Feb 21 to address those comments. EMsmile (talk) 15:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]